Catalog — QPU record · IonQ · Trapped ion
IonQ Forte Enterprise
IonQ Forte Enterprise is a trapped ion gate-based processor by IonQ with 36 qubits (2023). Below: every publicly disclosed figure with its source, method, and vendor-claim status — plus what is not disclosed, recorded as findings.
Measurement records9 disclosed · 1 not disclosed · 3 sources
Select a figure to open its record
Qubit count (physical_qubit_count)36 qubitsvendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- VENDOR_UNSPECIFIED
- Notes
- Corroborated by Azure Quantum docs (36 qubits, ionq.qpu.forte-enterprise-1).
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:physical-qubit-count:2026-08-19]
Algorithmic qubits (#AQ) (algorithmic_qubits_AQ)35 (described as 'an #AQ 35 quantum computer' at unveiling) #AQvendor claim
Vendor claim
- Source
- IonQ Unveils Forte Enterprise and Tempo (press release) · published 2023-09-27
- Method
- IonQ #AQ benchmark (QED-C-derived)
- Notes
- The vendor spec page does not state a distinct current #AQ for Forte Enterprise.
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:algorithmic-qubits-aq:2026-08-19]
Two-qubit gate quality (two_qubit_gate_fidelity)99.6% (stated as 0.4% 2Q gate error) %vendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- Direct Randomized Benchmarking
- Aggregation
- not stated
- Notes
- Azure docs: 'base quantum computing hardware and performance are the same' as Forte.
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:two-qubit-gate-fidelity:2026-08-19]
Single-qubit gate quality (one_qubit_gate_fidelity)99.98% (stated as 0.02% 1Q gate error) %vendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- Clifford Randomized Benchmarking
- Aggregation
- not stated
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:one-qubit-gate-fidelity:2026-08-19]
Readout (readout_SPAM_fidelity)99.5% (0.5% average SPAM error) %vendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- state preparation and measurement error
- Aggregation
- average
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:readout-spam-fidelity:2026-08-19]
Coherence (T1)10-100 svendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- VENDOR_UNSPECIFIED
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:t1:2026-08-19]
Coherence (T2)~1 svendor claim
Vendor claim
- Method
- VENDOR_UNSPECIFIED
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:t2:2026-08-19]
Gate duration (two_qubit_gate_duration)not publicly disclosed
Not publicly disclosed — checked 2026-08-19
- Finding
- No public disclosure found. This is a recorded, dated finding — we do not substitute an estimate or borrow a figure from a sibling device.
- Sources queried
- ionq.com/quantum-systems/forte-enterprise; learn.microsoft.com provider-ionq; docs.ionq.com; aws.amazon.com/braket
- Notes
- Forte-class figure of ~900 us average appears in the Forte 30-qubit paper (arXiv:2308.05071) but no Forte Enterprise-specific duration is published.
Pricing model (pricing_model_exists)Yes - available via AWS Braket (on-demand per-task + per-shot model; IonQ QPUs require minimum 2,500 shots per task with error mitigation) and Azure Quantum (Pay-As-You-Go, QGS-metered, debiasing-based pricing)verified
Independently corroborated
- Source
- Amazon Braket Pricing
- Method
- VENDOR_UNSPECIFIED
- Notes
- The Braket pricing page fetch surfaced explicit dollar figures only for 'Forte' ($0.30/task, $0.08/shot, $7,000/hr reservation); a Forte Enterprise-specific line item was not visible in the fetched content.
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:pricing-model-exists:2026-08-19]
Announced year (announced_year)2023 (unveiled Sept 27, 2023 at Quantum World Congress as rack-mounted enterprise-grade system)vendor claim
Vendor claim
- Source
- IonQ Unveils Forte Enterprise and Tempo, Rack-Mounted Enterprise-Grade Quantum Computers (press release) · published 2023-09-27
- Method
- VENDOR_UNSPECIFIED
- Notes
- Listed as an active Braket device (Forte-Enterprise-1) and Azure target as of retrieval, confirming public cloud availability.
- Citation key
[ionq/ionq-forte-enterprise:announced-year:2026-08-19]
QPU137 is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by IonQ. Figures above are public disclosures recorded with their sources on 2026-08-19; vendor claims are labeled as such and may not be directly comparable across measurement methods — see methodology.